Upcoming Consultant Contract Detail

Status: Closed: Selected

** PLEASE NOTE:  Bassed on the variety of services required to be qualified it was determined that interviews would not be conducted for these statewide services.


CONSULTANTS SELECTED

Cultural Resource Services
Aurora Research Associates, LLC
GAI Consultants, Inc.
Michael Baker Jr., Inc.
SKELLY and LOY, Inc.
SWCA, Incorporated
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
TRC Engineers, Inc.

Natural Resource Services
Ecological Specialists, Inc.
EnviroScience, Inc.
GAI Consultants, Inc.
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Michael Baker Jr., Inc.
Mountain State Biosurveys, LLC
SKELLY and LOY, Inc.

Notice of Consulting Services

 

Notice is hereby given by the West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, that consultant services will be utilized for the performance of various tasks to be performed under the following Statewide (On Call) Agreements:

 

Statewide Cultural Resource Services - Consulting services will be utilized for cultural resource services for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.  The work will generally consist of Section 106 documentation and related work including identification surveys, evaluations for National Register eligibility, and data recovery projects for historic and archaeological resources.

 

Statewide Natural Resource Services - Consulting services will be utilized to provide Natural Resource work for NEPA compliance relating to roadway and bridge projects in West Virginia.  The work will be performed statewide upon specific requests by the Division of Highways and may include, but not necessarily be limited to; stream and wetland studies, state and federal listed endangered species investigations, non-listed species surveys and biological surveys, and other related services.

 

Method of payment shall be Lump Sum per assignment.

 

Multiple firms may be selected for this work.

 

Firms interested in being considered for any or all of these projects must submit a “Letter of Qualification” for each project and one unpriced prospectus to Ms. Nancy L. Davidson, Section Head, Administrative Section, Engineering Division, Division of Highways, Building Five, Room A-663, 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East, Charleston, West Virginia 25305-0430 prior to 4:00 p.m. on January 25, 2013.

 

As a minimum, the prospectus shall include the following evaluation factors:

 

       1.        Professional qualifications necessary for consideration and satisfactory performance of the required work shall be provided for that person-in-charge of overseeing the work.  That person shall be located within the office where the work is to be performed, and shall demonstrate sufficient past experience performed for the State of West Virginia, Department of Highways related to design and plan development to be provided. This individual shall be readily accessible to the Department, preferably located in-state. 

       2.        Consideration shall be given to specialized experience and technical competence. Specialized experience shall focus on the qualifications of the staff working on the project with emphasis placed on individual specialized expertise required for the project.  As a minimum, the firm shall provide a Résumé of those individuals who will be committed to the needs of the project.  Strong considerations will be based on the professional and non-professional staff specialized experience and technical competence stationed within the office where the work is to be performed.

 

       3.        Capacity consideration shall be made on the firm’s ability to accomplish the work within the Department’s required schedule time frame; personnel dedicated to perform such work.

 

       4.        Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules.

 

       5.        Location shall be based on the geographic location of the Consultant’s office relative to the project site along with past experience and knowledge of the area where the project site is located with the significant importance being given to accessibility of the office location relative to the Department.

 

In addition to the above evaluation factors, the prospectus shall include, as a minimum, the following items:

 

       1.        A completed copy of the Division’s Consultant Confidential Qualification Questionnaire dated January 1, 2013 or later, if not already on file.  It must specifically indicate the staff levels by classification located in-state vs. out-of-state. (Sentence deleted) 

       2.        Location of office or office(s) in which the work, or part of the work, will be performed.

 

       3.        Identification of subconsultants by name as to the type of work anticipated to be subcontracted or performed, if proposed as part of the design team.

 

       4.        Indication of whether a cost accounting system has been maintained and is in effect such that it is capable of segregating and identifying accumulating costs for each job that is performed under cost type projects.

 

       5.        Completed copies of the Division’s “Consultant Short List Selection Criteria Technical Evaluation” form limited to a single page of data.  One loose leaf copy of form is to accompany the bound unpriced prospectus.  Cross referencing on this form to other parts of the prospectus is not acceptable.

 

       6.        (Requirement deleted) 

A single “Letter of Qualification” for each project and one unpriced prospectus are required and must contain all of the above information required to be considered.  Failure to provide the required information and/or insufficient information will cause disqualification and the prospectus will be returned. All evaluation factors as noted herein before will be given equal consideration in the selection process, unless a project specific weighting of the evaluation factors is shown in the Notice for Consulting Services.

 

Prior to entering into any contract negotiations, the selected firm and any subconsultants shall submit a current audited overhead rate computation performed by a State or Federal government agency or independent CPA firm.  The submitted overhead audit shall contain a detailed exhibit of the computations with all applicable eliminations and references.  The audit shall be done in accordance with Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and all eliminations required by the Federal Acquisition Regulations will be made.  The submitted certified audited overhead (Indirect Cost Rate) report shall include the certification, certifying that the allowability of costs used to establish the final indirect cost rate are in accordance with the FAR cost principles, or a verification indicating this certification was previously submitted and accepted by the cognizant agency.  This requirement will be waived for the selected firm or any subconsultant when its portion of the fee for the project is less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).  In such instances, a company computed overhead rate may be utilized.

 

It is the policy of the West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, that Disadvantaged and Women-owned Business Enterprises shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds.

 

  

WV DOT Privacy Notices | Contact Us | Site Map | Disclaimer
E.E.O./AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

Privacy, Security and Accessibility | WV.gov | USA.gov | © 2014 State of West Virginia